Josephine Baker

Getting to know…

Josephine Baker was born on June 3, 1906, in St Louis, Missouri. As usual, just another baby born not knowing who or what she could become. In her early years, she experienced abuse, poverty and by the time she was in her teens she was living on the streets, with no food but what was in the bins. When she moved out at age 14, her new job leads her to a new husband only to be divorced at age 15 and then remarried again. Later on in her life, she became one of the best exotic dancers[1].

Breakthroughs for Black Performers

At the age of 19, Josephine was asked to join an all-black performance in Paris where the city was in a jazz crave. African American musicians and performers were being mesmerized by the French people. In one of her performances, she and her partner wore nothing but a couple of feathers which got the crowd excited, particularly the men. Baker loved Paris because in the United States, African Americans were discriminated in society, whereas in Paris she felt nothing but welcomed. When WWII broke out, she helped smuggle refugees and performed benefit concerts to keep the troops amused. After the war, she went back to Paris and continued to perform finally making it on television. Following her marriage to Jo Bouillon, she decided to restore a castle and village named Les Milandes, where she spent a ton of money with hopes to create it into a tourist target. After that, she went back to the United States to stand up against American racism by declining to entertain any segregated crowds. This was a huge breakthrough creating May 20thas Josephine Baker Day[2].

Feminism

During her century, several women didn’t have a say in anything. Although the Civil Rights movement was allowed all people in public places, and the ability to vote, Black women were still forced to work as domestic workers, cook, or maids. These women should not have to experience and less respect in public places or their own atmosphere. When Baker resumed to the United States she came to the realization that there was still a tremendous lack of respect that wasn’t being given to all people. Even with all of her Successes, she was not being treated equally. Black women were working, taking care of their family, while also fighting for their equality. Aside from everything, happiness needed to be a priority[3]. When Josephine passed away at age 68, twenty thousand people were standing down the streets in Paris to see the procession. Baker was the first American women ever to be buried in France with military honors. This shows how much of an impact she had on earth, and that her fight for equality and rights have made a difference in the world[4].

The Charleston

This is a dance connected with jazz that was created in the 1920s. This dance came from the song “The Charleston” which was composed by James P. Johnson. This dance is significant because people performed it by themselves which made it unique compared to the other dances of the 1910s. Josephine Baker contributed to The Charleston being wildly popular because she did the dance in 1926 at the Folies Bergère. It kept growing in popularity starting in a two-act musical comedy and eventually opening up on Broadway[5].

Shown in this video, the two ladies are dancing the Charleston. Growing up dancing my whole life, I have for sure done this move almost every year in our jazz routines. I found that you can even use it in different genres such as hip-hop if you change the groove while keeping the right footwork. It is a catchy dance/song, and it is widely known even in today’s society.

WWII

Not only did Josephine help smuggle immigrants, but when she had realized security wasn’t checking her bag thoroughly because of her fame, she started to sneak all different kinds of things in and out of the country. On her sheet music, she had invisible ink filled with different types of messages. Sometimes, she even snuck photos of German military installations by sticking them into her underwear[6]. At the end of the war, Josephine Baker was awarded the Legion of Honour and Military Cross. This proved how dedicated she was, but she kept going after this, by taking part in a charity gala for the victims of the war[7].

To sum it up, Josephine Baker spent her life helping out and doing what she believed in. Although she felt the United States still needed much more change to reach fairness, I believe her going back there and fighting for her rights still played a major role in their society and Europe’s. It is proven how incredible of a woman she is throughout this blog between her performances, her strong beliefs, and her being honored by the military at her funeral. She was an incredibly brave woman who knew what she wanted and strived for it. When I first researched her name, the first thing that came up was that she was an exotic dancer. But after researching deeper, it is clear how much she impacted everyone around her.

  1. Joanne Griffith. “Josephine Baker: From exotic dancer to activist.” BBC. December 31, 2014. http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20141222-from-exotic-dancer-to-activist.
  2. BHS. “Josephine Baker.” BlackHistoryNow. August 17, 2011. http://blackhistorynow.com/josephine-baker/.
  3. Heidi Williamson. “What Josephine Baker Teaches Us About Women’s Enduring Legacy Within The Civil Rights Movement.” Think Progress. August 28, 2013. https://thinkprogress.org/what-josephine-baker-teaches-us-about-womens-enduring-legacy-within-the-civil-rights-movement-2b4a95b666fd/.
  4. “Josephine Baker Biography.” Biography. Accessed July 18, 2018. https://www.biography.com/people/josephine-baker-9195959.
  5. “Charleston.” A Closer Walk. Accessed July 18, 2018. https://acloserwalknola.com/dances/charleston/.
  6. Ethan Trex. “5 Things You Didn’t Know About Josephine Baker.” Mental Floss. June 3, 2017. http://mentalfloss.com/article/23148/5-things-you-didnt-know-about-josephine-baker.
  7. Amélie. “Josephine Baker.” December 27, 2007. https://myhero.com/Josephine_Baker_INSA_FR_07.

The Payola Scandal

Payola;

      (n.) a secret or private payment in return for the promotion of a product, service, etc., through the abuse of one’s position, influence, or facilities. 1

That is the broad definition of payola. But how does it relate to music? In short payola in the music industry referred to labels paying disc jockeys under the table for extra radio time.  Payola was suspected to have existed for years before 1959, so why did it only become a household word in the 50’s? The uprising in payola practices was likely due to many factors, such as the emergence of better recording technology, the new popularity of “Top 40” music, and the fact that the number of american jockeys had increased x20 2. The investigation into radio practices, which led to the Payola Scandal of 1959, actually began in the game show industry when numerous popular game shows were accused of fraud.  After this discovery, the National Association of Broadcasters investigated 100s of disc jockeys across the country.  Jockeys were taking payments up to $22,000 and passing them off as “consulting fees”. Among the accused was Alan Freed, the man who coined the term “rock ‘n’roll”3.  Freed faced 26 counts of

Alan Freed
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alan_Freed_disk_jockey.jpg

commercial bribery but got away with only having to pay a fine. Dick Clark, one of the top djs in America at the time, was also among those who were suspected of payola. Clark ended up not being accused, but whether he was truly participating in the payola game, we’ll never know for sure.

 

 

 

“Protect your ass at all times”  ~ Dick Clark in a Rolling Stones interview

Dick Clark
https://www.flickr.com/photos/alan-light/254837623

After the investigation was over, the government amended the Federal Communication Act of 1934. The act regulates telephone, telegraph, and radio communications in the United States. Payola was listed as a misdemeanor under the amended act to discourage illegal private payments. Under this act, jockeys must now disclose to listeners  if airplay has been purchased by labels. The penalty’s put in place for payola were fines up to $10,000 or one year in prison. 4

With that being said, even after the act was amended, payola continued and forms of payola still persist today. Companies have gotten smarten and found more innovative ways to hide their illegal activities, making the problem more sophisticated. Companies today have more resources and therefore further reach, going as far as to run fake promotional competitions and then rigging it so the djs always win.  This was the case in one of the more recent huge scandals involving Sony BMG in 20055. As payola becomes more widespread in the music industry, it becomes more and more common because innocent labels will feel the need to get on board in order to stay competitive. That spiral effect is the reason payola continues to get more and more complicated.  It’s  so popular, bands make parody songs about it; as shown in the song  Hey, Mr.DJ, I Thought You Said We Had a Deal, by They Might be Giants.6

Payola influences the music we are exposed to because it allows larger more resourceful labels to get the upper hand.  Money and power outshine pure talent, therefore we are constantly exposed to the the music produced by the top dogs instead of what the public deems as pure talent. The “Top 40” playlist is no longer a representative of what the listeners like, but more so which label handed out the most cash. In a way we are being told what we like and what should be popular because our exposure is being filtered by the jockeys who are participating in payola. Of course this is a never ending cycle, big labels and artists continue to get stronger while small start up artists can’t get a break, meaning we as listeners don’t get exposure to new talent who cannot afford to pay off the djs. Radio stations that participate in illegal activity continue to grow while they run the good guys out of business.

After learning so much about the presence of payola in the world, my opinion is neither for nor against it.  While I feel payola is morally wrong, being realistic, I recognize the place for it in today’s very competitive business environment. Business thrives on the unspoken rules of engagement,  and once you know the unwritten rules being used, you can use them to climb the latter to success. The sad truth is in every industry these politics exist that our unfair to the underdog.  So while I do agree payola is a bad thing ethically, I see why it has become such a prominent scam in the radio industry.

References

1 Dictionary.com. “Payola.” Accessed July 18, 2018. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/payola.

2 Performing Songwriter. “Alan Freed and the Radio Payola Scandal”. Accessed July 18, 2018.  http://performingsongwriter.com/alan-freed-payola-scandal/.

3 Modesto Radio Museum. “Payola Scandal Rocks 50’s Radio”.  Accessed July 18, 2018. http://www.modestoradiomuseum.org/payola.html.

4 U.S. Department of Justice. “The Communication Act of 1934”. Accessed July 18, 2018. https://it.ojp.gov/PrivacyLiberty/authorities/statutes/1288.

5 The Balance Careers. “Payola: Influencing the Charts”. Accessed July 18, 2018. https://www.thebalancecareers.com/payola-influencing-the-charts-2460759.

#M3Q4

Live Concert Review

#M3Q4

I recently attended a concert performed by the famous American country music singer songwriter Luke Bryan at the Country Thunder music festival. Bryan got his start in 2007 with his debut album “I’ll Stay Me”. Bryan has accomplished a lot since his start in 2007; he has released 6 albums, 4 compilation albums, 25 singles and most importantly 19 number one singles. Bryan has many musical talents including singing, guitar, piano and song writing. Bryan’s personal life has involved many tragedies. Bryan lost his older brother at the age of 19 in a tragic car accident. Years later his sister unexpectedly passed away leaving her three children and husband behind. Tragedy struck once again seven years later when her husband passed unexpectedly as well. Bryan and his wife took the three children in as their own and continue to raise them along with their own two children. Bryan appears to be a very genuine and kind person which helps him to thrive in the industry.

Unlike other country music artists Bryan incorporates a variety of genres into his music. Influences come from Rap, R&B, electronic, pop and rock, this sets Bryan apart and makes his music much more diverse and not as traditional. Bryan’s music goes from sappy love songs to partying in a cornfield all while maintaining the integrity of the country music genre. Bryan and his band use instruments like banjo, guitar, drums, bass, sometimes a piano or fiddle. One of his many number one singles “Country Girl (Shake It For Me)” is still very popular following its release in 2011. The following verse embodies Bryan’s style of country:

“Sombody’s sweet little farmer’s child
With a gattle in her Bud to get a little wild
Pony-tail and a pretty smile
Rope me in from a country mile
So come on over here and get in my arms
Spin me around this big ole barn
Tangle me up like grandma’s yarn
Yeah, yeah, yeah”

 

The word choice and rhyming flows very smoothly and tends to “pump up” the crowd. Bryan uses this style to get the crowd singing and engaged with the upbeat rhythm, beat and lyrics. This particular song is a country rock song, veering away from traditional country music that artists like George Strait may sing. The song below by Strait shows the classic country we are used to, the pure country with no other genres influencing.

 

The concert was performed at Country Thunder in Craven, Sk on July 15th, 2018. The venue was a wide-open space with the stage front and centre. Even with the large crowd present Bryan worked the crowd impressively taking the crowd through a wide variety of emotions. Craven is in rural Saskatchewan and Bryan’s songs like “Kick the Dust Up” and “Huntin’, Fishin’ & Lovin’ Everyday” are relatable to many. Bryan grew up in a small town in Georgia and based his songs on a lot of his experiences growing up which are very similar to many of the concert attendees.

 

Luke engaged the crowd in a meaningful way throughout the entire concert. His song “Drink a Beer” is dedicated to his brother whom he lost in a car accident, emotions were running high not only on the stage but also in the crowd. Luke hit home with the audience when he appeared on stage wearing a Humboldt Broncos T-shirt as a tribute to everyone affected. Luke stole the crowds heart with not only his music but his character and strong stage presence. The ability to form emotional relationships with the audience adds an effect to the entire experience for everyone. I enjoyed this concert not only because I love country music but because Luke Bryan is an amazing performer and has a certain “presence” you may say.

Proof of attendance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Citations:

Anon, (2018). [online] Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/06/magazine/what-makes-luke-bryan-country.htm [Accessed 19 Jul. 2018].

 

Bryan, L. (2018). Luke Bryan. [online] Biography. Available at: https://www.biography.com/people/luke-bryan [Accessed 19 Jul. 2018].

 

Thefamouspeople.com. (2018). Who is Luke Bryan? Everything You Need to Know. [online] Available at: https://www.thefamouspeople.com/profiles/luke-bryan-14631.php [Accessed 19 Jul. 2018].

 

 

The Payola Scandal

M6Q3   The Payola Scandal

Payola can be defined as “a secret or private payment in return for the promotion of a product, service, etc., through the abuse of one’s position, influence, or facilities.”1 In the 1950’s and even today this means private payment or bribery from a record company or artist for radio play to increase popularity of a song and/or record without the public knowing.

In 1959, when the payola scandal occurred, radio air play was the number one way for record labels to promote their artists, giving disc jockeys a great amount of power. Record labels wanted listeners to hear their artists and therefore took matters into their own hands by paying (or giving other incentives) disc jockeys for air play. The extent of the payments ranged from a couple hundred dollars to Chicago DJ Phil Lind admitting to accepting $22,000 to play one record.2 The practise of payola became so prevalent that eventually an investigation was launched by the US government.3

 

Dick Clark and Alan Freed were two major players caught up in the payola scandal. Alan    Freed, the disc jockey who essentially gave “rock and roll” its name, ended up taking the fall for many corrupt disc jockeys and the payola scandal ultimately cost him his career.4 Dick Clark, business man and host of popular TV show American Bandstand, testified before congress in 1960 and was not charged for any crimes and went on to have a successful career including creating and producing the American Music Awards show.5 He was required to dissolve all of his musical interests and shares to save his TV career.

Dick Clark in the 1950’s

 

 

 

 

The Federal Communications act was amended and payola officially became illegal in 1960, making it a misdemeanor charge.6 People guilty of payola face fines of $10,000 and/or prison for one year or less. This took away much of the power that disc jockeys had as they now did not have the power to decide what was played. On radio stations today, broadcasters are required to disclose to listeners when information is aired in exchange for money or services and/or when sponsorships are involved.7

Even after payola became illegal it still went on under-the-table and still does today. Payola is the reason why you won’t hear many undiscovered artists and groups on the radio. Instead, there are artists you hear repeatedly and repetition almost forces us to enjoy whatever is on the radio. You can also find payola on television and internet. In 2015, it was revealed that many music labels were making payments to Spotify in order to get songs on certain playlists.8 Not to mention the leaked Sony- Spotify contract revealing millions in advanced payments and advertisements for Sony on Spotify.9 It has become normal for major music label marketing teams to include playlist promotion (soliciting of songs to streaming companies) in their marketing strategies.10

For upcoming artists, this means an uphill battle to get their music heard as it costs around $300,000 to get a song on radio at a national level.11 I believe it has a negative impact on the music industry as many talented artists are not able to get their music out at a large scale due to major music labels paying for spots on playlists and top charts. Artists today can use free social media websites (Facebook, Instagram Twitter) to help get their voices heard which was not the case in the 1960’s. Payola has also become a lot more complicated today than simply slipping a disc jockey $200 and a record. A lot goes on under the table and much of the public does not know which major music labels own large percentages in Spotify, Deezer and other streaming services and therefore can influence who is on the top charts and popular playlists.

In todays society this can be tied into “social media influencers” who are paid to promote certain products. Instead of products becoming popular on their own from people buying them and enjoying the product, social media influencers are offered monetary compensation in exchange for promoting certain products. This occurs extensively on Instagram and YouTube. Although influencers are required to state if it is an advertisement or paid promotion/partnership, promotions like these can significantly boost sales depending on the influencers size of following. 

 

 

The Truth About Minstrelsy

Hello again! Taylor here. In today’s blog I am going to be discussing an aspect of history that has helped shape popular music, along with blues and jazz. These genres have been influenced by many things over time, but for now I am going to focus on minstrel shows

As described by Joseph Byrd in his article “Whitewashing Blackface Minstrelsy in American College Textbooks”, the minstrel shows were performances of song and dance, along with mockeries of lectures, opera and concert music. They were originally created in England by Charles Dibdin. In his shows, black people were made fun of in comical performances. Eventually this theme moved its way to the United States: a place where African-American slaves were a part of regular life. Slavery soon became a popular theme in minstrelsy.

Here is a clip of a minstrel show.

Another composer Byrd talks about is Dan Emmett, who created a quartet called the Virginia Minstrels. This was where “true blackface minstrelsy began”.[1] In Emmett and the Virginia Minstrels’ shows, they used the banjo and the Americanized fiddle.

 

Jim Crow
https://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~rwest/wikispeedia/wpcd/wp/m/Minstrel_show.htm

He goes on to explain two very important composers of the minstrel shows. They were Thomas Dartmouth “Big Daddy” Rice and George Washington Dixon. Together, in the 1830s, they created the most popular characters of minstrelsy:  Jim Crow and Zip Coon. These characters’ songs and dances became extremely popular. Other shows were quick to follow their lead, causing minstrelsy to become mainstream music.

The Virginia Minstrels
https://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~rwest/wikispeedia/wpcd/wp/m/Minstrel_show.htm

Another composer Byrd talks about is Dan Emmett, who created a quartet called the Virginia Minstrels. This was where “true blackface minstrelsy began”.[1] In Emmett and the Virginia Minstrels’ shows, they used the banjo and the Americanized fiddle.

Alongside Emmett, Byrd brings up Stephen Foster, an additional important figure of the minstrel shows.  He composed songs that were based on extremely exaggerated stereotypes of the African- American slaves, idolizing and enforced the ideas of slavery. His lyrics focused on spreading horrible lies that said African-Americans had freedom to stop work whenever they wanted and that they were happier as slaves. One of Foster’s most popular songs was his 1848 hit ‘‘Oh! Susanna.”  In the song, the language of the African-American characters contains poor speech skills, portraying them as dumb. This became very popular in minstrelsy lyrics. By 1864, Foster became “America’s minstrel”.[2] As a result, the misconceptions, created by Foster and the other composers of the show, worked their way into the white audience’s daily life.

Stephen Foster: “Oh Susanna!” *Notice the spelling and grammar of the lyrics*

Byrd explains that these racist themes and ideas of the minstrel shows had a major impact on society. Not only could people attend the show, they could buy the sheet music to take home and play as well.

Stephen Foster
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Stephen-Foster

Constant exposure to misconceptions caused the racial conflict to stand strong. People truly believed African-Americans were better off as slaves and they had no worth to society. Because the show was comical for the white, working class audience, it caused minstrel songs to quickly become mainstream.

The racism from the minstrelsy was pushed on and continued past the performances. It even contributed to the racism that continued on into the 20th century. However, Byrd points out that it is usually avoided in textbooks. Authors tend to skip over the racism and only cover a very small portion of minstrel history. Even in college level textbooks, authors avoid the uncomfortable topics of minstrelsy.[3]

In this article I was interested to learn that the minstrel shows did not originate in the United States. The U.S. was a place where slavery was common and racial conflict was high, and where I would assume minstrelsy would come from.

I was also shocked to see inserts of the actual lyrics of the songs. The racism and portrayal of African-Americans is outrageous and hard to believe as actually true.

In Byrd’s article he states that “male youth culture was evolving into a lumpenproletariat”.[4] Byrd is using the term “lumpenproletariat” to refer to the working, low class group of white males that made up the audience at minstrel shows who are laughing at the African-American characters.[5] Therefore, African-Americans are being viewed as even lower than the already low class audience. This displays how little African-Americans meant to white people in this time in history. They were categorized as lower than the already low working class, explaining why the lyrics and portrayals of African-Americans in minstrel songs were so crude and reprehensible.

Jim Crow Song Book
http://americanhistory.si.edu/brown/history/1-segregated/white-only-1.html

We now approach the genre of minstrelsy at a harsher angle. After learning the truth behind the comical shows, they lose their happy and comical mask they have been hiding behind. By no means were the minstrel shows innocent, harmless comedies. We now approach the genre knowing the cruel lyrics and portrayals were intentionally created to amuse the white working class.

 

This extreme extent of racism is what also helped create the Jim Crow laws. The Jim Crow laws were “a collection of state and local statutes that legalized racial segregation.”[6] The name is derived from one of the key characters in minstrelsy: Jim Crow. These laws separated the white people from the black in almost every public place. For example, public facilities like restaurants, waiting rooms, hospitals, parks and theaters were segregated. Both races could never use the same facilities at the same time, even though they were for the public. Signs were posted everywhere warning black people to stay out. Danger and violence had become a normal part of their lives up until after WWII when the civil rights movement began.[7]

https://www.amazon.com/Popular-Music-America-Beat-Goes/dp/0840029764

 

Today, textbooks avoid the harsh racist reality of the minstrel shows, ignoring the fact that white people truly enjoyed them. I believe the reasoning is because it is hard to face such a dark past. No one wants to admit that such crude entertainment was loved by people and brought into their homes in the form of sheet music.  It is embarrassing to admit that people of your country took part in such a racist show. Therefore, it is important to face the reality of Minstrel shows and take accountability. We need to create a better understanding how racism impacts the world, even today. This way, we can make up for any wrong done and prevent it in the future.


[1] Joseph Byrd “Whitewashing Blackface Minstrelsy in American College Textbooks,” Popular Music and Society, 32:1, (2009): 78, DOI: 10.1080/03007760802207882

[2] Ibid. 82

[3] Joseph Byrd “Whitewashing Blackface Minstrelsy in American College Textbooks,” Popular Music and Society, 32:1, (2009): 77-86, DOI: 10.1080/03007760802207882

[4] Ibid. 78

[5] “Lumpenproletariat,” The Free Dictionary, accessed July 14, 2018, https://www.thefreedictionary.com/lumpenproletariat

[6] “Jim Crow Laws,” History.com, July 15, 2018, http://www.history.com/topics/jim-crow-laws

[7]Ibid.  

Works Cited

Byrd, Joseph. “Whitewashing Blackface Minstrelsy in American College Textbooks,” Popular Music and Society, 32:1, (2009): , DOI: 10.1080/03007760802207882

“Jim Crow Laws,” History.com, July 15, 2018, http://www.history.com/topics/jim-crow-laws

“Lumpenproletariat,” The Free Dictionary, accessed July 14, 2018, https://www.thefreedictionary.com/lumpenproletariat

Mamie Smith-Queen Of Blues #M2Q2

Mamie Smith born Mamie Robinson was not only known for her role in pioneering blues music as a woman she dabbled in other entertainment as well, such as performing on vaudeville shows as a singer, dancer, pianist, and she was an actress as well appearing in a few films intermittently starting in 1929 with “Jailhouse blues” to her last film in 1943 called “Because I love you.” However, not much is known about Mamie Smith’s life beyond her entertainment career. It is believed that she was born on this date in 1883 in Cincinnati, OH.[1] Much of her early years are an enigma to many, which has left people who have been influenced by her, completely mystified by the lack of knowledge of her previous life before her entertainment career. “Though technically not a blues performer, Mamie Smith notched her place in American music as the first Black female singer to record a vocal blues”. [1]  With that being said she transformed what the public originally thought of the status quo for someone who sang the blues. Being the first female to record as a blues singer she paved the way for many future ethnic minorities especially females that did not think it was possible previously.  “Crazy Blues” (recorded August 10, 1920), which sold a million copies in its first six months and made record labels aware of the huge potential market for “race records.” This paved the way for Bessie Smith (no relation) and other blues and jazz performers”. [1]  Mamie Smith passed away in 1946 in Harlem nothing has been documented about how she passed but this seems to be the theme for this blues icon. Which leaves her personal life to the imagination of the audience, her music speaks for her it may even give insight into her personal life, that creates a portrait for the population of listeners that often wondered about the background of this legend of blues.

Crazy Blues

“Crazy Blues” is possibly Mamie Smith’s most famous song, with “Her high, vibrato-laden style” [3] Mamie Smith delivers power to each of her songs. The song ‘Crazy Blues’ itself follows the structure of similar blues songs and the premise we all know in the lyrics which typically involves an event that has left the artist with the “blues.” In this particular song Mamie Smith sings about the man she loves, In the first verse of the song she makes it apparent that this man does not treat her right but as the song progresses it takes on a much deeper meaning. She sings rendition of about the times he had left and how her love for him made her blind. The end of the song caps off the theme of the song “her man is always leaving her” even in the time of his passing.

‘Now the doctor’s gonna do all that he can
But what you’re gonna need is an undertaker man
I ain’t had nothin’ but bad news
Now I got the crazy blues’ [4]

That Thing Called Love

Mamie Smith dubbed the ‘The Queen of the Blues’ [2] for good reason this songs tempo takes on a different tone when comparing it to ‘Crazy Blues’ personally I think this song shows the diversity and versatility in Mamie Smith’s voice unlike like her previous song that played on the emotional premise that the song took on, where the vocals seemed more sombre then that of ‘That Thing Called Love.’ What intrigues me is the theme of the song once again encapsulates the definition of the blues, reading through some YouTube comments they liken her to a jazz artist which I’m in total disagreement with I think Mamie Smith laid the foundation down for future female blues singers to come with her passionate vocals and her cadence that delivers an impact only the most adept blues singers can deliver to their audience.

Lord, I Love That Man

This is my personal favorite, I find it interesting how she starts with the chorus and then follows up with a verse which seems a little unorthodox when compared to a more popular structure for a song. This song recorded live in 1939 really puts Mamie Smith’s voice on display showing the maturity in her voice when comparing it to the previous songs that were recorded early in her career. I feel in this song we really get a taste of the power Mamie Smith has when she belts the lyrics as if this is her benediction and decree about love, men, and the emotion that goes along with relationships. She truly puts on display the meaning of the blues when she performs not to mention her stage presence that commands the attention of the audience it would be disingenuous to not have Mamie Smith named amongst the greatest blues artists of the twentieth century.

Bibliography

  1. 2018. Cincinnati’s own, Mamie Smith. https://aaregistry.org/story/cincinnatis-own-mamie-smith/
  2. 2018. Mamie Smith. July 10. https://www.allaboutbluesmusic.com/mamie-smith/
  3. Nager, Larry. 2001. Mamie Smith: Early blues and jazz legend broke color barriers. January 4. http://enquirer.com/editions/2001/01/04/tem_mamie_smith_early.html
  4. Songfacts, LLC. 2018. CRAZY BLUES by MAMIE SMITH. http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?lyrics=11184

 

 

The Payola Scandal of 1959

The Payola Scandal of 1959

“Payola is the payment of cash or gifts in exchange for airplay.” “Payola” is a contraction of the words “pay” and”Victrola” (LP record player), and entered the English language via the record business. The first court case involving payola was in 1960” (Payola, 2018). Records began to replace live performance as the main way

https://bit.ly/2L3vSUR

to hear—and sell—music. And labels recognized that popular disc jockeys could influence sales.Fingers pointed and words flew over payola, but it wasn’t until the TV quiz show scandals of 1958 (most famously, the show Twenty-One was found to be fixed) that the government got seriously involved. Once the “Do you now or have you ever …?” questions began, the jig was up.With the threat of losing their licenses, some radio stations took the precaution of firing disc jockeys who might put them at risk. In November 1959, in closed and open sessions before the U.S. House Oversight Committee, 335 disc jockeys from around the country admitted to having received over $263,000 in “consulting fees.” Freed went down in 1960, and Congress amended the Federal Communications Act to outlaw “under-the-table payments and require broadcasters to disclose if airplay for a song has been purchased.” Payola became a misdemeanor, with a penalty of up to $10,000 in fines and one year in prison (Hutchinson, 2015).

Most Well-Known Disc Jockeys

First you might ask what is a Disc Jockey? The Disc Jockeys were individuals who controlled the airwaves by picking the musical rotation and they had immense amounts of power because of it. “Every time a label had a record that really needed to be pushed, it entered into a devil’s bargain with the disc jockeys”(Kelly, 2016). The two Disc Jockey’s below were both publicly connected to the Payola Scandal in 1959.

Dick Clark

During the 1950s, Dick Clark also began investing in the music publishing and recording business. His business interests grew to include record companies, song publishing houses, and artist

https://bit.ly/2uxeAo

management groups. When the record industry’s “payola” scandal (involving payment in return for airplay) broke in 1959, Clark told a congressional committee he was unaware performers in whom he had interests had received disproportionate play on his programs. He sold his shares back to the corporation, upon ABC’s suggestion that his participation might be considered a conflict of interest (Dick Clark Biography, 2017).

Alan Freed

Freed was accused of having taken such payments, a charge that he denied. Throughout the ensuing witch hunt, Freed steadfastly

http://bit.ly/2JzDQPT

maintained that he never played a record he didn’t like. Nonetheless, he was blackballed within the business (“Alan Freed”, 2018).

Payola Today

Unfortunately, as long as there has been a music industry, there have been attempts — both overt and clandestine — to manufacture hits. You can look as far back as the early 20th century, when musicians known as “song pluggers” were paid to promote sheet music. Today, large media companies own most major-market radio stations. Payola investigations in the mid-2000s led to multimillion-dollar settlements by several major label conglomerates, as well as four of the nation’s largest radio station owners (McCabe, 2017). One of the most popular ways to listen to music now is not only radio, but listening to media streamed online.

http://bit.ly/2JAs5sJ

These streaming applications include popular playlists and the top hits which demonstrate another form of payola. One example of this would be the application called Spotify. To better monetize their free tier, Spotify is testing their new ‘Sponsored Songs’ feature.  The move will allow brands to put their ads in popular playlists, which sounds fine.  But it’ll also allow labels to promote individual songs, a move that introduces some tricky payola issues (Sanchez, 2017). I believe payola to be bad thing. Payola technically decides which artists and what music will succeed or fail. The listeners may not hear the great music that comes from those who cannot afford to promote their music like others can. The overall idea of payola hurts the music businesses morals and honesty.

Works Cited:

“Alan Freed.” Retrieved July 15th, 2018. https://www.rockhall.com/inductees/alan-freed

“Dick Clark Biography.” A&E Television Networks. April 21th, 2017. Retrieved July 15th, 2018. https://www.biography.com/people/dick-clark-9249296

Hutchinson, Lydia. “Alan Freed and the Radio Payola Scandal.” Performing Songwriter. August 20, 2015. Retrieved July 15th, 2018. http://performingsongwriter.com/alan-freed-payola-scandal/

Kelly, Kim. “A Brief History of American Payola.” Noisey. February 14th, 2016. Retrieved July 15th, 2018. https://noisey.vice.com/en_us/article/64y8y9/a-brief-history-of-american-payola

McCabe, Allyson. “In an Ever- Changing Music Industry, Cash for Hits Remains a Constant.” January 17, 2017. Retrieved July 15th, 2018. https://www.npr.org/2017/01/17/509851163/in-an-ever-changing-music-industry-cash-for-hits-remains-a-constant

“Payola.” Retrieved July 15, 2018. https://www.history-of-rock.com/payola.htm

Sanchez, Daniel. “Spotify Introduces a Brand-New Feature: Payola.” Digital Music News. June 20th, 2017. Retrieved July 15th, 2018. https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2017/06/20/spotify-sponsored-songs-payola/

NO PAY, NO PLAY: PAST AND PRESENT PAYOLA (#M6Q3)

Payola

Payola is the illegal practice of bribing a performer, or more commonly a music station, to play a certain song. Payola was first observed in the press during the late 1930s, when big bands were all the rage.[1] Music labels believed that song exposure and popularity were key to optimizing the amount of performance royalties and sheet music sales of a song, so they would pay popular bands to play their songs.[2] There had been some failed attempts to stop payola throughout the 1930s and 1940s, but payola was only becoming more common with time. In the 1950s, as radio stations became more powerful, the system of payola changed from a bribe between the publisher and the performer to a bribe between record companies and disc jockeys.[3]

The 1959 Payola Scandal

The Payola Scandal of 1959, in which Congress began to crack down on the issue of bribery within the music industry under Congressman Oren Harris, was the product not only an increase in payola over the years, but the rivalry between the American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers (ASCAP) and Broadcast Music Inc. (BMI). ASCAP was allegedly unhappy with how many artists from BMI were getting exposure (presumably through payola), so ASCAP was hoping that through the abolishment of payola, their own musicians would have less competition.

Two of the most well-known disc jockeys of the 1950s, Alan Freed and Dick Clark, were only a couple of the over three hundred DJs who were impacted by the 1959 Scandal.[4] Clark had connections to keep him from getting charged, which left Freed as the most liable and famous DJ guilty of payola – accordingly, he seemed to have suffered the most out of all the DJs involved in payola.[5] Freed was charged with 26 counts of commercial bribery and was given various fines as well as a suspended jail sentence. Freed, the man who is literally credited with thinking of the term rock’n’roll[6], ended up dying broke and with a terrible story attached to his name. Because rock and roll was the most popular genre during the time of the Payola Scandal, the genre became associated with the idea of corruption, which added to the decline of its popularity in the early 1960s.[7]

Dick Clark, perhaps in court smiling at the fact that he knows his connections and baby-face will stop him from getting any severe punishment [source: http://performingsongwriter.com/alan-freed-payola-scandal/]
Sadly, Alan Freed didn’t have the same luck that his colleague, Dick Clark, did. [source: http://www.pophistorydig.com/topics/tag/alan-freed-payola/]

Payola Laws

 In 1960, Congress officially prohibited payola: secret payments were outlawed, and broadcasters were now required to state if a publisher or artist had paid for their song to be played on air.[8] This new law left room for many creative loopholes from music labels and DJs, not to mention undisclosed payments were still quite feasible if they remained under the Congress’ radar. An example of this is the 2005 case against Sony BMG Music Entertainment and radio stations. After it was discovered that Sony was engaging in some form of payola, they had to pay $10 million and agree to stop paying radio employees to feature artists under their label.[9]

Modern-day Payola

 Under the current payola laws, payola is still very much so alive today, but just in a different way. A commonly seen modern-day version of Payola is streaming services’ ‘Recommended songs/albums based on your listening history’ feature. If you have Apple Music, Spotify, Tidal, or any other streaming service, you are likely familiar with this feature. Artists can pay these streaming services to recommend their music next to other artists of their choice. Artists hoping for more exposure can similarly pay streaming services to feature their music on particular popular playlists.[10] The modern version of payola definitely impacts the music we’re exposed to: I often use the ‘track radio’ feature (which essentially curates a playlist of songs based on one song that I want to listen to) when I’m using my streaming service and end up listening to songs I never would have chosen otherwise. I think that modern payola is a gift and a curse – I can personally say that many of the artists and songs I love listening to now were recommended to me by Tidal (my streaming service of choice) based on my frequently searched artists. I don’t think it’s necessarily unethical for an artist to pay to get exposure near artists with similar sounds, because the recommendation is thus understandable. I can also attest to the fact that almost half of my recommended albums and artists on Tidal is music that I would absolutely never listen to, which is frustrating. I think if artists or record labels are going to pay to have their music promoted, they should do so in a way that makes sense (near artists/genres that resemble their sound). Another issue that I have with payola is that artists who are signed to less successful labels, or are independent artists, likely do not have the same resources available to make use of modern-day payola. In an ideal world, there would be no payola and only songs that listeners wanted to listen to most would be given exposure. Sadly, it’s a bit of a chicken-and-egg dilemma – it’s hard to know what generally comes first with the most listened to songs: the song being given a lot of exposure because it is listened to a lot, or the song being listened to a lot because it is given a lot of exposure.

Bibliography

[1] Coase, R.H., “Payola in Radio and Television Broadcasting”, The Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 22, Issue 2, 1979: 270, accessed July 16th, 2018, doi: 10.1086/466944

[2] Ibid.

[3] Coase, R.H., “Payola in Radio and Television Broadcasting”, The Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 22, Issue 2, 1979: 286, accessed July 16th, 2018, doi: 10.1086/466944

[4] Kelly, K. “A Brief History of American Payola”. Noisey – Vice. February 14, 2016. Accessed July 18, 2018. https://noisey.vice.com/da/article/64y8y9/a-brief-history-of-american-payola

[5] Ibid.

[6] Ibid.

[7]  Campbell, Michael. Popular Music in America: The Beat Goes On. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Schirmer Cengage Learning, 2013.

[8] Kelly, K. “A Brief History of American Payola”. Noisey – Vice. February 14, 2016. Accessed July 18, 2018. https://noisey.vice.com/da/article/64y8y9/a-brief-history-of-american-payola

[9] Sherwin, A. “Payola: One of music’s oldest arrangements back with a bang on streaming playlists”. Independent UK. August 20, 2015. Accessed July 18th, 2018. https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/payola-one-of-musics-oldest-arrangements-back-with-a-bang-on-streaming-playlists-10464513.html

[10] Ibid.

Mamie Smith

#M2Q3

Mamie Smith was born in 1883 and is Historically well known in the music industry as well as the African American community. She was the first female artist to produce a phonograph record in 1920.[1] “Crazy Blues” was a top hit of the era selling a million copies in the first six months it was released. [2] Which went down in history as the start to “Race records” ultimately landing a spot in the Grammy Hall of Fame in 1994.[3] The Library of Congress selected “Crazy Blues” to be eternally persevered in the National Recoding Registry in 2005. [4] Mamie was exceptionally talented in the performing business as a dancer, pianist, actress as well as an American vaudeville singer.[5] Although Mamie Smith past away in 1946 her legacy continues as one of the most influential singers. 

[1] “Smith, Mamie 1883–1946.” “Smith, Mamie 1883–1946.” Gale Library of Daily Life: Slavery in America. 2018. Accessed July 18, 2018. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/historians-and-chronicles/historians-miscellaneous-biographies/mamie-smith.

[2] “Smith, Mamie 1883–1946.” “Smith, Mamie 1883–1946.” Gale Library of Daily Life: Slavery in America. 2018. Accessed July 18, 2018. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/historians-and-chronicles/historians-miscellaneous-biographies/mamie-smith.

[3] “GRAMMY Hall Of Fame.” GRAMMY.com. January 31, 2018. Accessed July 18, 2018. https://www.grammy.com/grammys/awards/hall-of-fame#s.

[4] “2005 – National Recording Preservation Board | Programs | Library of Congress.” Apple Computers: This Month in Business History (Business Reference Services, Library of Congress). Accessed July 18, 2018. https://www.loc.gov/programs/national-recording-preservation-board/recording-registry/registry-by-induction-years/2005/.

[5] “Smith, Mamie 1883–1946.” “Smith, Mamie 1883–1946.” Gale Library of Daily Life: Slavery in America. 2018. Accessed July 18, 2018. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/historians-and-chronicles/historians-miscellaneous-biographies/mamie-smith.

 

Crazy Blue”

“Crazy blues” went down in history as one of the most influential songs of all time. When one critique it a deeper meaning can be found. Many people hear the raw lyrics of a heart broken woman who cannot get over the man she loves. When listening to the lyrics one particular line stands out “Now I see my poor love was blind”. This particular phrase indicates that she realizes the mistreatment and the tears that were shed for that man. Mamie indicates that she was blind through it all until the man she loved left. A lesson is drawn from this that tough times bring bigger and better things. “Crazy Blues” has a swing like rhythm making the song quite catchy even though it is expressing a sad time in her life. This song is a good contribution to her career as it was one of the most well known song of her era and to this day it marks a piece of history.

 

“The Da Da strain”

I feel like this song created happiness in a room, it made people want to get up and dance. It has a high tempo in some spots that expresses the excitement that people feel while singing and dancing. “The Da Da strain” is a lot different than her other hits as she mostly wrote about heart break and love. This song is easy to follow and sing along too due to its repetitive chorus. This song expresses how communities come together to socialize focusing less on the valleys in life and finding the hills.This truly expresses how music brings people together as a whole and is enjoyable for all parties. 

“Lord I love that man”

This song is very simplistic in the melody and the lyrics themselves. Once again, we see a repetitive chorus as we do in the song “The Da Da strain”. This symbolizes how artist have their own style and express it in every song the write. The tempo is slow and the intensity of the instruments is low allowing Mamie Smith’s voice to shine. Her voice is very powerful in this song as it expresses her love for the lord and the man she loved. The ending of this song really stands out as the instruments get loud and Mamie’s voice almost sounds like she’s shouting which draws the crowd in. I believe this song captures her strong stage presence and her unique style which helped her career path take off.

Mamie Smith created beautiful music that captured many life lessons that stay true today. Her warm stage presence and strong voice drove her to the top. Her love life seemed to drive the majority of her career but who doesn’t go through a lifetime with out heart ache. This allowed her to connect with her audience and create a fan base. Her African American decent tried to hold her back in the racial era she lived in but rose above all and created hope for not only women in the industry but Black women and men.

#M2Q2 The Importance of Mamie Smith

Biography:
https://bit.ly/2uxrtPx

Although little is known about her early years, scholars believe that Smith was born Mamie Robinson in Cincinnati, Ohio in 1883. By the age of 10 she was working as a vaudeville entertainer and touring with the Four Dancing Mitchells. She continued to tour with various acts throughout her teens. By 1913 at the age of 20 she was living and working in Harlem and soon after married William “Smithy” Smith. She remarried twice after her career took off (Garner, 2018).

Obstacles of Race:

A newspaper article by a black writer from 1921 talks about the exploitation of black musicians by phonograph companies. The companies used these musicians of color to sell blues music to black record buyers, but still excluded other musicians of color who performed different kinds of music. This picking and choosing of what music to produce and sell contributes to the problem of erasure in black music. There are certain kinds of music that are recorded and preserved, but others aren’t, even if they are equally important (Kenny, 2017).

ALTHOUGH,

Mamie Smith’s record was purchased by black and white consumers and was recognized as a lucrative marketing segment by studios and record company executives (Garner, 2017).

Mamie Smith’s Significance:
http://bit.ly/2uzPCVH

Mamie Smith was the first to record blues songs in 1920 with her versions of Perry Bradford’s “Crazy Blues”, and “It’ s Right Here for You” on Okeh Records. The record was a wild success, selling over a million copies in less than a year, and finally ending up selling over two

http://bit.ly/2uxzVyf

million copies (Red Hot Jazz, 2018).  Mamie Smith’s music seemed to open up the eyes of those around her. Record companies thought there was a lot of money to be made selling what was then called “race records” to various minority groups in big cities. The success of “Crazy Blues” prompted other record companies to also try to find other female blues singers that could match the sales of “Crazy Blues”. It was a very important record, because it opened the doors of the recording industry to African-Americans, whether they were Blues, Jazz or popular singers or musicians. Smith herself really wasn’t that much of a Blues singer (Red Hot Jazz, 2018).  Mamie Smith’s music was loved for many reasons. “Crazy Blues”, represents the emergence of black female singers into popular music culture and was therefore a very important contribution to black music. Her pioneering musical career paved the way for more successful female blues and jazz artists like “Ma” Rainey, Bessie Smith (no relation), and Billie Holiday (Garner, 2018).

Success:

Smith’s amount of success and talent was unbelievable. Smith found herself suddenly wealthy, and she spent much of her earnings on clothes, jewelry, real estate,

http://bit.ly2zPJmhX

and servants (Garner, 2018). With all this Mamie Smith mania, New York City suddenly became the blues recording capital of the world. Mamie Smith records have enjoyed tremendous sale in all parts of the country.Mamie Smith and her jazz hounds came, saw, and conquered in Chicago during the month of February. She played to large audiences on the South Side at the Avenue Theatre with immense success.In Mamie Smith’s prime, her stage appearances netted her up to $1,500 a week. Bedecked in diamonds, plumes, and a shimmering gown, she could get a standing ovation just by strutting across the stage (Jasobrecht, 2018). Mamie Smith overall made a historic mark on the musical world that lead women in the right direction to pursue their own music.

Crazy Blues

This was a song about being in a relationship and the love and heartbreak that can go along with it. Throughout this song she wears her emotions on her sleeve about the love she has for a man. Although she also expresses that the love isn’t reciprocated and that he doesn’t treat her right. This song is significant because it was the first blues song recorded and was also recorded by a female which was the first step for black female vocalists.

That Thing Called Love

This song was also a very popular hit of Mamie Smith’s and was her first song recored for OKEH Records.  It has a slower pace and is clearly another love song.

Don’t Care Blues

This song opens up with a wide variety of instruments that catches your attention and ear instantly. Immediately when Mamie Smith begins to sing the lyrics speak to you about being down and out.

Works Cited:

Garner, Carla. “Smith, Mamie.” Black Past. Retrieved July 15th, 2018. http://www.blackpast.org/aah/smith-mamie-1883-1946 

Kenny, Grace. “Mamie Smith’s Crazy Blues.” October 10th, 2017. Retrieved July 15th, 2018. https://pages.stolaf.edu/americanmusic/tag/mamie-smith/

“Mamie Smith.” Retrieved July 15th, 2018. http://www.redhotjazz.com/mamie.html

“Mamie Smith: The First Lady of the Blues.” Retrieved July 15th, 2018. http://jasobrecht.com/mamie-smith-the-first-lady-of-the-blues/