‘Shuffle Along’ the History of Black Performance in America

Hi, my name is Olivia and I’m in my fourth year of Sociology.

Today I will be talking about the musical, ‘the Making of the Musical Sensation of 1921 and All That Followed’ from the New York Times Magazine article “’Shuffle Along’ and the Lost History of Black Performance in America.”

In early American theatre and much of the 19th century, African-American people were not allowed to perform onstage because, the physical stage itself had power in it. Blackface, a minstrel show practice, where white and (later) black performers applied burnt cork to darken their complexion. Black people who did black face to perform on stage, but had to hide their blackness behind a darker blackness. As white people placed boundaries for what black performers could express on stage, putting enormous pressure on black people go appear behind a mask previously worn by white performers. A mask which only mocked themselves, their own race, while at the same time giving up power all in order to entertain and please white audiences.

‘Shuffle Along’ reinforced the original purpose of blackface of mocking African Americans, through the continual use of burnt cork on performers faces. As a blacks-in-blackface production, the blackface mask prevented black people from being their own selves. However, it challenged the taboo black sexuality because, it made white people uncomfortable if black people indulged in too much lovemaking. ‘Shuffle Along’ also challenged the typical rhythms in musical theatre, through the the use of ragtime (by mixing European forms, harmony and textures with African-inspired syncopation) and jazz into the American musical. While the Chorus lines’s song-and-dance style to the syncopated and jazz songs, popularized songs such as “Love Will Find A Way,” “Bandana Days” and “In Honeysuckle Time” within the musical setting; which shifted the meaning of blackness, allowing the faces behind the blackface mask to gain some recognition as a performer.

Among the music in ‘Shuffle Along’, the song which remains the most well-known is “I’m Just Wild About Harry” which was written and composed by Eubie Blake and Noble Sissle. Although it was originally a love song, I had never heard of it before taking this course. It is a song that has since been recorded and performed by many different artists.

Here is one version of “I’m Just Wild About Harry” sung by Judy Garland:

“Patting Juba” is an African dance where the performer drums on their body, by slapping their chest and knees and the soles of their feet. By wearing hard-soled shoes on a wooden floor, it created a drum which could be used during the dance. Patting Juba was seen as a black thing, so it was performed in blackface. The second Juba dancer referred to as ‘Juba’ was a young black kid was the best in the world. His story is included, because he too based on his ‘race’ and skin colour could not find success with a broad white audience unless he was painted with blackface. Titled as the first great American tap dancer, his real identity will forever remain a mystery because, he was never able to be his true self. His image, painted in the only way ‘others’ could accept him; in a blackface mask. Juba’s image will always remain indistinguishable from the others, from the white men because, they are all painted the same. Only a caption can tell us which is him.

Among the claims of historical significance, “Shuffle Along” has often been called the first successful black broadway show. However, ‘success’ split less than two years after its opening on Broadway because its creators disagreed with the show’s profit as most was earned from the written songs of Eubie Blake and Noble Sissle. However, credit should be given to William and Walker productions like their 1907-9 show “Bandanna Land” which played in a more legitimate “broadway” house unlike the Sixty-Third Street Music Hall and attracted large white audiences before “Shuffle Along” came along. “Shuffle Along” has also been called the beginning of the Harlem Renaissance, an artistic movement deeply tied to and influenced by jazz, musical theatre and other popular styles of music at the time. A show based on past forms of stage entertainment of Minstrelsy and Vaudeville; “Shuffle Along” only introduced syncopation in the American Musical. So “Shuffle Along”, did not start but was a part of the Harlem Renaissance.The true beginning of the Harlem Renaissance should be the Great migration which occurred after the Civil War where African-Americans migrated from the south to northern cities such as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia and Detroit. The Great Migration allowed writers, musicians and artists to artistically express their culture and political, social, and economic conditions of being black in America to achieve equality and civil rights in American society.

The concept of the 2016 show was a transformation of black entertainment. Not doing “Shuffle Along” but what led to the making of “Shuffle Along.” By telling the story of the original creators and cast of the 1821 shows to show how they pulled it off, along with various white outsider perspectives who commented on the original show. Here are highlights from the 2016 show:

Prior to reading this article, I had no knowledge about the conditions and challenges faced by early African American performers. The physical stage itself had power in it. Blackface was the only way for black performers to be accepted in front of white audiences. Always under criticism for what they lack and no set expectations of ‘true acceptance’ by society, prevents black performers to be who need to be.

The textbook does not give a fair perspective on blackface in America because it only defines what is as a minstrel show practice of darkening their skin complexion with burnt cork. The text primarily focuses on white performers and briefly mentions African American performers. It never describes the context behind blackface and why it became a popular form of stage entertainment for white people or what blackface meant for black performers.

Sources:

Campbell, Michael. Popular Music in America: The Beat Goes On. 4th ed.* Boston: Schirmer/Cengage Learning, 2013.

History.com Staff. “Great Migration.” History.com, A&E Television Networks, 2010, www.history.com/topics/black-history/great-migration.

History.com Staff. “Harlem Renaissance.” History.com, A&E Television Networks, 2009, www.history.com/topics/black-history/harlem-renaissance.

Reign, April. “Broadway Black History: Shuffle Along.” Broadway Black, T&L Productions Andrew Shade, 14 May 2015, broadwayblack.com/shuffle-along/.

Sullivan, John Jeremiah. “’Shuffle Along’ and the Lost History of Black Performance in America.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 24 Mar. 2016, www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/magazine/shuffle-along-and-the-painful-history-of-black-performance-in-america.html?mcubz=1.

Hello class

My name is Allison, I am taking this class as an elective to complete my degree by this August! Hoping to learn some interesting things in the next few weeks.

Minstrelsy and the Problem of Race

Hello everyone!

My name is Selinah. I am currently in my 3rd year of my BA in Psychology! I am 27 (well I will be in August anyway haha), engaged to an incredible man, and have two daughters aged 6 and 7!

We also have two dogs, a bearded dragon (he’s evil, I swear), and a chinchilla!

In addition to attending University full time, I also work full time for the Saskatoon Health Region! In other words, I have no life outside of my family, work, and university haha! Anyway, that is enough about me!

Minstrelsy and The Problem Of Race

I have decided to write my first blog about minstrelsy and race for the simple fact that I had never heard of the term prior to taking this course. In my entire 27 years of existence, the term “minstrelsy” has never come up in any social or academic conversations. Because I was not aware of what Minstrelsy was, I had no idea that the music we know and love today exists because of it!

The article titled “Whitewashing Blackface Minstrelsy in American College Textbooks”, written by Joseph Byrd, provides a lot of useful information that our textbook fails to mention. In brief, Byrd’s article explores the ways in which minstrelsy incorrectly portrayed the lives of African Americans in the 1800s. According to Byrd, the message/image that was commonly portrayed in Minstrelsy performances was that African American’s were happier as slaves than they ever would be as free people, slavery offered them a good life, and that they were well cared for by their “owners” (80-81). In addition to Minstrelsy incorrectly portraying the lives of African Americans, it strongly reinforced racist stereotypes. Byrd addresses how Dan Emmett, the front man for the Virginia Minstrels, is able to “employ at least three racist stereotypes: blacks are larcenous, stupid, and ugly” (79) in just one short verse in his song “Old Dan Tucker”. Ultimately, his article truthfully explains what Minstrelsy is, thoroughly describes its history, and addresses the fact that it even though it is a huge part of the history of music, it is rarely discussed.  According to Byrd, colleges do not want “students to know about, or instructors be forced to deal with, the existence of such music” (82). In conclusion, Byrd asserts that when powerful publishers and schools try to remove Minstrelsy from American history, it must be challenged because it is an important chapter in African American history as well as music’s history.

What caught my interest in this article was the article itself. In comparison to our text, Byrd carefully analyses a topic that is typically brushed under the rug. I enjoyed his thorough analysis of minstrelsy and race because our textbook fails to really explain anything.  According to Byrd, the term Lumpenproletariat defines the “low-paid and unemployed first-generation whites and Irish immigrants trying to survive in an unskilled labor force that included first-generation free blacks,…” (78). In other words, Lumpenproletariat is a socially constructed term that describes individuals who are not white, not born in America, are of the poor working-class, and are unskilled. Considering that the intended audience for minstrelsy were lower-class individuals, and the individuals considered to be Lumpenproletariat were just that, I myself approach this genre with confusion. Why create an entertainment genre that is incredibly inaccurate and racist for an intended audience that will be offended by it? I understand why Byrd acknowledges that blackface minstrelsy was “closely related to the rise of populism,…” (78). Populism is a hard word to define (seriously, try to find one clear definition online!). However, because Byrd states minstrelsy is closely linked to it and we know who minstrelsy’s audience was, we can assume that when used in this context, it refers to a conflict between the American born white people and anyone not falling under that category.

Jim Crow Laws

Slavery (which Minstrelsy had inaccurately portrayed) ended after the Civil War. However, immediately afterwards America enacted the Jim Crow Laws. These new laws segregated African American people and white people. If you were white, you were superior. If you were black, you had no legal, economic, or political rights (Michael Campbell 95). So after years of slavery, mockery (through minstrelsy), and a war to end it all, America found a new way to once again treat African American’s poorly. Cleverly, they named the laws after a well known character from the minstrel show.

The character of Jim Crow was created in 1832 when Thomas Dartmouth Rice claimed to have observed an “African American street entertainer in Cincinnati doing a song and dance with a peculiar hop step, which he called ‘Jumping Jim Crow'” (Campbell 25). How frustrating it must have been to finally see an end to slavery and then have new discriminatory laws enacted that were named after a racist character.

Conclusion

It is important for us to understand what minstrelsy was, and is, because it is a chief example of the hatefulness of white America, and a true example of the horrible experiences African American’s were forced to endure. While minstrelsy eventually allowed African American’s a foot in entertainments door, the racist aspects of it were unnecessary. I believe that textbooks deliberately avoid this material because it is an embarrassing part of American history. However, like the Holocaust and Residential Schools, it cannot, and should not, be erased from our history. We learn from our history, good and bad. Learning about Minstrelsy has taught me a lot about African American history and music’s history. I was aware of slavery and segregation, but I was not aware of minstrelsy and all of the racism surrounding it. As Byrd’s title clearly states, it is a way of whitewashing our history. Removing this aspect of history from text books does not remove it from history itself. It simply denies students the opportunity to learn about and fully understand African American history when the whole point of a textbook and school is to educate.

Works Cited

Brimmage, Ashley. “Alexander’s ‘The New Jim Crow’ Banned in American Prisons.” The Chimes | Biola University, 31 Jan. 2018, chimes.biola.edu/story/2018/jan/31/alexanders-new-jim-crow-banned-american-prisons/.

Byrd, Joseph. “Whitewashing Blackface Minstrelsy in American College Textbooks.” Popular Music and Society, vol. 32, no. 1, 2009, pp. 77–86., doi:10.1080/03007760802207882.

Campbell, Michael. (2013). Popular Music in America: The Beat Goes On. 4th ed.* Boston: Schirmer/Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-0-840-02976-8

“Kylie Jenner Accused of Doing ‘Blackface.’” saboteur365, 6 Apr. 2015, saboteur365.wordpress.com/2015/04/06/kylie-jenner-accused-of-doing-blackface/.

TheVisionChasers. YouTube, YouTube, 20 June 2014, www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2Iwa9LeuFM.

 

 

 

W. C. Handy – “The Father of Blues”

Hello, I’m Reed, a 4th year computer science student.  I live here in Saskatoon. I enjoy video games, movies, art of all kinds as well as music from all genres. I work as an application analyst for Nutrien. Introductions aside, I’ve decided to make my first post as a biography of most popular  and influential early blues musicians, C. W. Handy.

As a child, his father dissuaded him from music, only allowing him to play the organ. This didn’t stop him from pursuing it, and it became a force that engulfed his life. Like many black musicians of the time, Handy got his first taste of performance as a part of a minstrel show production. Though he briefly became a teacher, his passion was always in music[1].

W. C. Handy

Handy wrote that he discovered what came to be known as the blues in 1903 by watching a black man plunk a guitar strangely.  “As he played, he pressed a knife on the strings of the guitar in a manner popularized by Hawaiian guitarists who used steel bars… The singer repeated the line three times, accompanying himself on the guitar with the weirdest music I had ever heard[2].” Inspired by this, he would use elements of the style while traveling with different bands, eventually settling in the clubs located in Memphis, Tennessee.  Here he would craft his first big hit, “Memphis Blues”, which was published in 1912.

The song sounds upbeat and catchy, with a memorable riff, its no wonder it caught on.  It was also fairly novel, and spread like wildfire due to its distribution of sheet music. Everyone wanted to play this new form of music, and to do that you needed the sheet. However, Handy never saw the financial success he deserved, because he had sold the rights of the song[1]. He received $50 for the sale of it, and watched as it exploded in popularity. This unfortunate experience inspired him to start his own publishing company, which would prove to be one of the best and most important decisions of his career.

Now in charge of his own music, Handy’s next big hit “The St. Louis Blues” was even more successful.

Unlike the first one, this song was less upbeat and cheery sounding, and less predictable. It has more syncopation, and more musical dominance by only one instrument at a time, instead of all of them competing equally. With his new publishing firm now directly in the spotlight, he was able to purchase new artists songs, while continually producing hit songs.

During this time, many songs would come out his publishing firm[3]. Often times, Handy would make his own versions of previously existing songs, recreating them in a blues style. For example, his song “Hesitating Blues” was based off “Hesitation blues”, a blues song credited to three artists which was again based off of an old tune. As well, his song “Loveless Love” was his take on “Careless Love”, another old well known song with many blues variations.

I’ve posted here a piano cover, because its difficult to find mp3 versions of Handy’s songs, outside of his two biggest hits. But it does well to emphasize the point that most of Handy’s songs became well known due to the spread of sheet music, and many people would recreate their own versions. One of the best known versions of the song is played by Louis Armstrong.

These competing styles show that the same song can sound radically different due to instrumentation and tempo. Connected by the same melody, but sonically very different, they paint different pictures. The piano version sounds light-hearted and playful, whereas the Armstrong version sounds laid back and relaxing. His gruff singing also adds a less open interpretation of the meaning being conveyed, as well as generally an important missing element. The addition of vocals allow for more musical expression.

W. C. Handy’s legacy is a very important one, but not without hardships. He was plagued with health scares, and racism and southern prejudice forced him to relocate his business to New York. Due to a fall from a subway platform in the 1940s, he received a skull fracture that caused him to develop blindness. In 1955, he suffered a stroke that left him wheelchair bound, and he died in 1958 from bronchial pneumonia[1].

However, despite the hardships and prejudice, his legacy endures. His achievements lead to him being known as the “Father of Blues”. Handy reached large white audiences with his book “Blues: An Anthology”, and his funeral was attended by 20,000 who filled the church and streets.

 

Sources:

1. “W.C. Handy.” Biography.com. October 27, 2015. Accessed July 05, 2018. https://www.biography.com/people/wc-handy-39700.

2. Banerji, Robin. “WC Handy’s Memphis Blues: The Song of 1912.” BBC News. December 30, 2012. Accessed July 05, 2018. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-20769518.

3. Nager, Larry. “W.C. Handy.” Memphis Music Hall of Fame. Accessed July 05, 2018. http://memphismusichalloffame.com/inductee/wchandy/.

4. Matteson, Richard. “Matteson Art.” Understanding Magritte – Matteson Art. Accessed July 05, 2018. http://www.mattesonart.com/11111111history.aspx.

Hola

Hello everyone, just trying to get accustomed to using WordPress.

I guess I’ll start off by stating some basic facts about my involvement in music. This is the second music class I’m taking at University level. I enjoy listening and experiencing music, so I hope this will be a fun class for me. I also enjoy the history and deciphering of musical lyrics.

I’ll be satisfied if i finish this class with enough information and experience pertaining to music that i do not already have.

I look forward to reading and viewing others’ perspective on music as well.

 

Thank you.