The 1920s saw a shift both in music, and in the way it was performed. In New York, there was a shift towards the acceptance of black performers, and one musical particularly stands out. “Shuffle Along” was written by Noble Sissie and Eubie Blake and debuted in 1921. It featured not only an all-black cast, but black writers and producers as well. It was an incredibly influential pieces of work, and there are many components that I would like to discuss, as based upon the article “”Shuffle Along”” and the Lost History of Black Performance in America”, written by John Jeremiah Sullivan and published March 24, 2016 by The New York Times Magazine.
Despite dispelling some minstrelsy tropes, for example, by having the characters show their emotions through romance, “Shuffle Along” also reinforced some of these ideas. Many of the actors darkened their faces artificially, using burned cork, greasepaint, etc. This was done to assuage the uncomfortable feelings of the white people attending these musicals. At the time, for black people to perform on a stage, as themselves, would be considered too high a power over the white community. However, the painting of blackface on white performers was still commonplace, so the black performers used this as a kind of façade. They hid their race and individuality behind their make-up, so as to succeed in entertaining their largely white audience. In addition, the musical served primarily as a comedy, which relied heavily on the minstrel tropes used to degrade black culture. However, while the use of blackface in this production may have reinforced its use at the time, the success garnered played a major role in the acceptance of black performers. As a result, in present-day, blackface is considered unacceptable and racist, and while racial prejudice still exists in the musical world, significant progress has been made towards equality.
In addition to an unease around the individuality and power a black performer holds, there was also a taboo surrounding black romance and sexuality. “Shuffle Along” features not only a romance between two black characters, but an affair at that. Pair that with songs exclaiming love, and the, albeit tame, on-stage touching of two romantically involved black characters (Green, 2016), and it’s clear to see that the show truly pushed the envelope in this regard.
Another way that “Shuffle Along” was innovative in its time was through the music itself. Typical musical scores generally consisted of song-and dance style songs and ballads. “Shuffle Along” featured a score of jazzy, ragtime music. This went well with the 16-girl chorus line featured, and these two are largely responsible for the show’s success. The chorus line helped to foster an acceptance of black performers in “burlesque” roles (Tanner) and to provide syncopation.
While many of the show’s songs became quickly popular, one stands out. “I’m Just Wild About Harry” grew to such popularity that during his campaign, Harry S. Truman used it as promotional material. The song is catchy, with close rhymes and short melodic phrases, which led to its success. I have heard this song before, but I believe I have only heard the Judy Garland and plain instrumental versions before, never a true performance as intended in the score.
As mentioned previously, many minstrel tropes were utilized by the writers to help ensure the success of their show. However, in my opinion, the use of “patting juba” does not fall into this category. Patting juba refers to dancing in which the performs slap their body, particularly hands and feet, to provide rhythm as they dance. It is largely considered to be a minstrel trope, as it was common practice in those performances in the late 1800s. However, patting juba began years earlier, when a black boy known as Juba performed the dance in a minstrel show. It harkens back to the days of African slavery, where slaves were not permitted instruments, and so used their bodies for rhythm instead (The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2014). Its use in “Shuffle Along” strikes me not as reaffirmation of a trope, but rather, reclamation of an important cultural symbol. Patting juba eventually evolved into modern day tap dancing, through the incorporation of some Celtic elements.
“Shuffle Along”, while an incredibly important point in history, does not live up to much of the credit allotted to it. Many dub this show as the first all-black musical, but this is untrue. That title belongs to the show “In Dahomey”, written by George Walker and Bert William, and performed in 1903 (Rylatt). The show began on Broadway, but due to its success toured the United States and parts of Britain. “Shuffle Along” has also been referred to as the beginning of the Harlem Renaissance. While the show helped to further this movement, it was by no means its start.
In 2016, a kind of revival of “Shuffle Along” was born. Rather than perform simply an updated version of the original show, director George Wolfe wanted to take the new show in a different direction. He wanted to tell the story of “Shuffle Along”, calling the new show ““Shuffle Along”, or the Making of the Musical Sensation of 1921 and All That Followed.” Because “Shuffle Along” was such an influential and groundbreaking show, it deserves a true tribute, and for those who worked to make it so great, to be remembered and appreciated.
This clip features the cast of the 2016 revival performing at the Tony Awards. The clip features the jazzy rhythm and syncopation the musical is known for, as well as tap dance and a take on the signature chorus line.
Reading this article made me really aware of the constant struggle that black performers faced, and the lengths they were forced to go to simply to be judged as would their white counterparts, let alone to succeed and be accepted. I was aware of “Shuffle Along” before taking this course, but I had no idea how important it was toward the equality movement, nor did I realize that so many important black performers got their start here (e.g. Josephine Baker, Florence Mills, etc.). I think it’s incredibly important that this particular musical be discussed in depth in this course when learning about the history of black music, and the role that blackface played in it. Personally, I had no idea that black performers were forced to darken themselves to hide their individuality, and it really brings a new light to modern blackface and the connotations that it has. I think that while the textbook is not inaccurate in its depiction of blackface, I don’t think it goes into enough detail regarding its history, and the effect it would have on the future, nor the reasons behind its “requirement” in minstrelsy.
#M3Q2
Works Cited
Green, Jesse. “Theatre Review: Shuffle Along Is a Gorgeously Staged, LifeChanging Show.” Vulture. April 28, 2016. http://www.vulture.com/2016/04/theater-review-shuffle-along.html
Rylatt, Eleanor. “In Dahomey at the Theatre Royal, Hull.” African Stories in Hull & East Yorkshire. https://www.africansinyorkshireproject.com/in-dahomey.html
Sullivan, John J. “Shuffle Along and the Lost Story of Black Performance in America.” The New York Times Magazine. March 24, 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/magazine/shuffle-along-and-the-painful-history-of-black-performance-in-america.html
Tanner, Jo. “Shuffle Along: The Musical at the Center of the Harlem Renaissance.” Faces of the Harlem Renaissance. http://artsedge.kennedy-center.org/interactives/harlem/themes/shuffle_along.html
The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. “Juba.” Encyclopaedia Brittanica. November 27, 2014. https://www.britannica.com/art/juba-dance