Overview
In this module, we will four qualitative data collection approaches. Interviews are the dominant form of qualitative data collection, while focus groups are used less frequently in political science research. Observation research is less commonly used, but provides unique real world insights into the dynamics and practice of politics. Discourse analysis is a form of textual analysis that goes beyond the surface meaning to texts.
As always, to help you better understand and engage with the ideas that we are covering in the modules ahead, I strongly encourage you to discuss the course material in the class discussion boards.
When you have finished this module, you should be able to do the following:
- Identify qualitative data collection approaches more commonly used in political science research;
- Identify what types of questions are most appropriate for interview research and detail the interview research process.
- Identify what types of questions are most appropriate for focus group research and detail the focus group research process.
- Explain what observation research is and how it is used in political science research.
- Explain what discourse analysis is, and how is it used in political science research; and
- Critically assess research that uses qualitative data.
- Read Chapter 9 in the 3rd edition of our textbook or Chapter 7 in the 4th edition of our textbook. Create self-study flashcards for the chapter.
- Watch mini-lectures “Qualitative Data Collection,” “Interview Research”, “Focus Group Research”, and “Observation Research.”
- Read Chapter 12 in the 3rd edition of our textbook or Chapter 11 in the 4th edition of our textbook. Create self-study flashcards for the chapter.
- Watch mini-lectures “Discourse Analysis” and “Critically Assessing Qualitative Research.”
- Complete Learning Activity.
- Hard to reach population
- Interview framework
- Observation research
- Hawthorne effect
- Obtrusive observation
- Unobtrusive observation
- Observation schedule
- Participant observation
- Field notes
- Discourse analysis
- Chapter 9 and Chapter 12 in Berdahl, Loleen and Keith Archer. Explorations: Conducting Empirical Research in Canadian Political Science (Third Edition). Oxford University Press OR Chapter 7 and Chapter 11 of Berdahl, Loleen and Jason Roy. Explorations: Conducting Empirical Research in Canadian Political Science (Fourth Edition). Oxford University Press.
Learning Material
Learning Activity
Field Research Challenges and Ethics Evaluation
- Read Speckhard’s article “Research challenges involved in field research and interviews regarding the militant jihad, extremism, and suicide terrorism.” In 300-500 words, outline at least three research challenges that she identifies, and the solutions that she suggests. Which challenges would you find most problematic and why? What ethical issues do you feel are raised by this type of research? In your response, use at least two terms covered in the module (readings and/or videos) and be sure that all terminology is used correctly. Proofread carefully.
- Post your response in your Learning Activity Discussion Board.
- Provide a constructive response to at least one of your fellow group members’ posts. A constructive response is one that (a) uses supportive language to (b) identify for the author an area in which the work can be strengthened. For example, it may identify an issue where the wording is unclear or a point where terminology is used incorrectly, or suggest ideas for examples or ways to strengthen the argument, or let the author know of questions that the work raised for them. A constructive response goes beyond ‘I agree’ or ‘that is interesting’ to assist the author in improving the work. It should provide feedback that is intended to assist the author of the learning activity in improving their work.
Speckhard, A. 2009. “Research challenges involved in field research and interviews regarding the militant jihad, extremism, and suicide terrorism.” Democracy and Security 5: 199–222.
Reminder: At the end of Module 12, you are required to select one learning activity for submission from Modules 9-12. You can use the feedback that you receive in the group forum to revise your selected learning activity prior to submission.
Glossary
data saturation the point at which interviews no longer provide a researcher with new relevant information.
discourse analysis a qualitative approach to analyzing texts that focuses on the meanings reflected in and created by discourses.
discourses sets of ideas, images, symbols, and messages that, taken together, articulate a particular version of events.
field notes detailed descriptions of events observed during observation research.
frames patterns of selection, emphasis, and presentation that draw on familiar myths, themes, or cultural values to organize discourses.
hard-to-reach population a population that is difficult for researchers to identify and/or that is less likely to participate in research studies than others.
Hawthorne effect a phenomenon that occurs when subjects under observation alter their behaviour because of the researcher’s presence.
interview framework a written list of questions that the interviewer intends to ask the respondent.
observation research a research design in which the researcher observes actual behaviour; also known as field research or ethnography.
observation schedule a checklist for recording behaviour in observation research.
obtrusive observation research observation research in which the subjects are aware that they are being observed.
participant observation an unobtrusive observation research design in which the researcher becomes part of the community under observation.
unobtrusive observation research observation research in which the subjects are unaware that they are being observed.
Note: Unless otherwise stated, glossary source is Berdahl, Loleen and Keith Archer. 2015. Explorations: Conducting Empirical Research in Canadian Political Science (Third Edition). Oxford University Press.
References
Berdahl, Loleen and Keith Archer. 2015. Explorations: Conducting Empirical Research in Canadian Political Science (Third Edition). Oxford University Press.
Koop, Royce, Heather Bastedo, and Kelly Blidook. 2018. Representation in Action: Canadian MPs in the Constituencies. University of British Columbia Press.
Panel on Research Ethics. 2010. “Chapter 5, Privacy and Confidentiality.” Tri-Council Policy Statement 2. Available at http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/initiatives/tcps2-eptc2/chapter5-chapitre5/#toc05-1 (accessed April 20, 2012).
Speckhard, A. 2009. “Research challenges involved in field research and interviews regarding the militant jihad, extremism, and suicide terrorism.” Democracy and Security 5: 199–222