Abstract. Constantly on the lookout for and with a vested interest in Canadian mathematics education matters, because if Canadian mathematics education matters then Canadian mathematics education matters, this article is an investigation into the Canadian lottery landscape. With apologies to the Atlantic Lottery, Loto-Québec and Ontario Lottery and Gaming, this article, based on where I live and have lived in Canada, is a deep dive into the British Columbia Lottery Corporation and the Western Canada Lottery Corporation (which includes Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba, and where Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut participate as associate members). By detailing the chances of winning Lotto 6/49, Western 649, Lotto Max and Western Max, I attempt to call into question the aphorism that the lottery is a tax on the mathematically challenged. A cursory look into the psychology of one player of the Canadian lottery (read: me), including an analysis of former lottery slogans, pushes against the notion (read: aphorism) that the lottery is a tax on the stupid. Lastly, a nouveau comparison between Canadian income tax rate brackets and lottery tax rates and brackets reveals, without a doubt, that the lottery, in the grand scheme of taxes, is a regressive tax. As a result, and still recognizing you are (probably) not going to win the lottery, it is time, I contend, for a new Canadian-lottery-based aphorism: the lottery is a tax on the willing.
Chernoff, E. J. (2023) The Lottery is a Tax on …. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 23(1), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-023-00269-y
Abstract. Constantly on the lookout for Canadian mathematics education matters, because if Canadian mathematics education matters then Canadian mathematics education matters, three young university bookstore employees, university students, unable to make proper change when I handed them a five dollar bill for a sticker I was purchasing for my laptop, absolutely crushed my spirit. As they say though, it is not what happens to you, rather it is how you react to what happened to you. As such, rising from what I am now calling “the sticker incident,” this article is a many part investigation into the oft-heard phrase “Damn kids these days cannot make change without a calculator.” Under examination: the subtraction skills of a particular subset of adult employees not often asked to prove their arithmetic resolve; detailing a personal mistake I made while making change in a big spot; recounting a retelling of a mistake that has haunted someone for many years; detailing which particular customers cashiers need to be worried about when making change (old men with coin purses); wonderings as to why stories about making change do not reflect our now penniless country; and, a brief look at the future responsibilities of cashless immigrants. With this particular matter now in the rearview mirror, I am back in the wild looking for other Canadian mathematics education matters. Stay tuned.






